The State of Maharashtra v. Nagnath Madav @Mahadeo Yadav and Anr.
Bombay HCFA/3053/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
... 1 ...
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
FIRST APPEAL NO.3053 OF 2006
¶4
...........................................................
OFFICE NOTES, OFFICE
MEMORANDUM OF CORAM,
APPEARANCES, COURT’S COURT’S OR JUDGES
ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS ORDERS
AND REGISTRAR’S ORDERS
¶5
...........................................................
Shri Y.M.Nakhwa, A.G.P for the Appellant.
Shri Milind Deshmukh for the Respondent.
¶6
CORAM : A. S. OKA, J.
¶7
DATE : JANUARY 15, 2007.
¶8
P.C.:
¶9
1. Admit. Printing is dispensed with.
¶10
2. Private paperbook along with Decree
¶11
Form shall be filed by the Appellant within
a period of one year from today. If
compliance is not made within stipulated
time, the Appeal shall stand dismissed for
want of prosecution without further
reference to the Court.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
AI extract
A. S. OKA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court