P.G.Lapalikar v. Mathew Thomas
Bombay HCFA/1938/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
¶2
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶3
FIRST APPEAL ST.NO.413 OF 2007.
¶4
P.G.Lapalikar.
Versus.
¶5
Mathew Thomas.
¶6
... Respondent.
¶7
Shri S.M.Gorwadkar for the Appellant.
¶8
CORAM : ABHAY S.OKA, J.
DATED : 16th January, 2007.
¶9
P.C.:
¶10
1.Admit. Printing is dispensed with.
¶11
2.Time of two weeks is granted to comply with the
objection regarding Court fees and process fees. If
compliance is not made within stipulated time, the
Appeal will stand dismissed for want of prosecution
without further reference to the Court.
¶12
3.Private paperbook along with Decree Form shall
be filed by the Appellant within a period of one year
today. If compliance is not made within stipulated
time, the Appeal shall stand dismissed for want of
prosecution without further reference to the Court.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
P.G. Lapalikar
- respondent
Mathew Thomas
Coram
AI extract
ABHAY S OKA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Navre Premises Co.Op. Society Ltd. Vs 1. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and Anr.
The National Cooperative Housing Society Ltd. Vs 1. the Maharashtra Water Supply and Sewerage Board and Ors.
The State of Maharashtra Vs Nagnath Madav @Mahadeo Yadav and Anr.
M/S. Shelar Friends Circle Vs the State of Maharashtra