Disposed
Navre Premises Co.Op. Society Ltd. v. 1. Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai and Anr.
Bombay HCFA/96/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FARAD CONTINUNATION SHEET FIRST APPEAL NO.96 OF 2007
.............................................................
Office Notes,Office
memorandum of Coram,
appearances,Court’sCourt’s or
orders or directionsJudge’s orders
& Registrar’s orders.
Ms P.S.Shah for the Appellant
CORAM: A.S.OKA, J.
DATE : JANUARY 15,2007.
P.C.:
1. One of the submissions is that the
case will be governed by the decision in
the case of Food Corporation of India Vs.
State of Punjab [(2001) 1 S.C.C. 291].
2. Admit as a substantial question of law
is involved. Printing is dispensed with.
3. Private Paperbook along with Decree
Form shall be filed by the Appellant
within a period of one year from today.
If compliance is not made within
stipulated time, the Appeal shall stand
dismissed for want of prosecution without
further reference to the court.
JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Food Corporation of India Vs. State of PunjabReferred¶7
(2001) 1 S.C.C. 291 · Who else cites this
Appellant
Respondent
A.S.OKA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court