This is a settled first appeal where the parties arrived at consent terms. The High Court recorded the settlement and disposed of the appeal on consent without any substantive adjudication.
Nulla
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 2075 OF 2007
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s OrdersCourt’s or Judge’s Orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mr. M.V.Gangal for the appellant.
Mr. M.B.Gawade for respondent
No.1.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED : 11th September, 2007.
P.C.
1. The parties have arrived at the
settlement by consent terms dated 4th
September, 2007, marked "X", taken on the
record. It has been singed by respondent 1
and 2 and their respective advocates. There
is no dispute about the identification,
signature and authorization. The parties
are present in the Court.
2. The undertaking given by the parties are
accepted.
3. The appeal is, disposed of in view of
the Consent Terms.
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
Appellant
Respondent No. 1
Respondent No. 2
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court