The applicant sought condonation of delay. The court found sufficient cause was shown and allowed the application, disposing of it accordingly, while keeping the main appeal for admission in the next week.
Application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) for condonation of delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Lsp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Application No. 1031 of 2007
in
First Appeal (ST)no. 25769 of 2005
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders
Court’s or Judge’s order
Ms.Vidya Manjrekar i\b. P.M.Havnur for the Applicant Mr.J.J.Xavier for BMC.
CORAM:- Anoop V. Mohta, J DATED:- 10th September, 2007.
P.C.
. Considering the averments made, a sufficient cause has been shown and, therefore, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The delay in the facts and circumstances is, therefore, condoned. Civil Application is disposed off accordingly.
next week subject to removal of office
objections, if any.
(Anoop V. Mohta,J)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay in filing the civil application.
Ms. Vidya Manjrekar i.b. P.M. Havnur
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
