The High Court of Judicature at Bombay allowed this civil application in terms of the prayer clause, noting the Respondent's lack of objection.
Civil application allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) & (b).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Lsp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Civil Application No. 4035 of 2007 in First Appeal No. 669 of 2000 -------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda Court’s or Judge’s order of Coram, appearances, Court’s orders or directions and Registrar’s orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------Mr. Girish Kulkarni i\b. S.A.Rahaman for the Applicant Mr.M.A.Attar for the Respondent CORAM:- Anoop V. Mohta, J DATED:- 10th September, 2007. P.C. . Considering the averments made and in view of the fact that the Respondents have no objection, the civil application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a)&(b).
(Anoop V. Mohta,J)
Applicant
Respondent
Anoop V. Mohta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
