Allowed
Sou. Suman Achyutrao Kulkarni and Ors. v. M/S. Bharat Transport Service Ltd. and Anr.
Bombay HCCAF/2885/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
INININ THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ssm
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2885 OF 2007
IN
FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.28800 OF2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Office Notes, Office Memoranda
of Coram, appearances, Court’s
Orders or directions and
Registrar’s OrdersCourt’s or Judge’s Orders
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mr. P.P.Killedar for the
applicant.
Mr. V.N.Sagare for respondent
No.2.
CORAM : ANOOP V. MOHTA,J.
DATED : 11th September, 2007.
P.C.
1. Considering the averments
made a sufficient cause has been
shown by the applicant for
publication. In the trial Court
also the applicant needs to take
such steps for publication. The
application is allowed in terms
of prayer clause (a).
2. The Civil Application is
disposed of, accordingly.
( 2 )
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a sufficient cause has been shown by the applicant for publication requiring steps in the trial court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant
Respondent No.2
Anoop V. Motta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court