Disposed

Akhil Bhartiya Bhrashtachar Virodhi Samaj Punarnirman Samiti and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. and Veena Developers (Intervener)

Bombay HC17 Aug 2007CHSW/7/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Bombay High Court made chamber summonses absolute in writ petitions regarding construction contracts and released fees to a Chartered Accountant. No substantive legal principles were laid down.

What did the court decide?

Chamber summonses made absolute; liberty to amend granted; CC to appear and produce work details for fee release.

Akhil Bhartiya Bhrashtachar Virodhi Samaj Punarnirman… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2007)

¶1

-1-

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶3

ORDINARY ORIGINAL SIDE JURISDICTION

¶4

Chamber Summons No. 7 of 2007 in Writ Petition No.1179 OF 2004

¶5

Akhil Bharatiya Bhrashtachar Virodhi

¶6

Samaj Punanirman Samioti & and

¶7

Petitioners.

¶8

¶9

State of Maharashtra and ors ..Respondents

¶10

and

¶11

Veena Developers ..Intervener

¶12

with

¶13

Chamber Summons No.9 of 2007 in Wit Petition No.1179 OF 2004

¶14

Akhil Bharatiya Bhrashtachar Virodhi Samaj Punanirman Samioti & and

¶15

Petitioners.

¶16

¶17

State of Maharashtra and ors ..Respondents

¶18

and

¶19

M/s Raheja Construction Co ..Intervener

¶20

with

¶21

Chamber Summons No10 of 2007 in Wit Petition No.1179 OF 2004

¶22

Akhil Bharatiya Bhrashtachar Virodhi Samaj Punanirman Samioti & and

Petitioners.

-2-

State of Maharashtra and ors ..Respondents and Castle Construction Co ..Intervener

¶27

with Chamber Summons No.152 of 2007 in Wit Petition No.1179 OF 2004

¶28

Akhil Bharatiya Bhrashtachar Virodhi Samaj Punanirman Samioti & and

¶29

Petitioners.

¶30

Vs State of Maharashtra and ors ..Respondents

¶31

and

¶32

Gaurav Villa CHS Soc Ltd ..Intervener

¶33

Mr.R.R Naik for petitioners

¶34

Mr. Milind Sathe with Mr. Subodh Joshi for M/s P.K. Shroff and Co for respondent No.3

¶35

Ms Geeta Shastri AGP for State

¶36

Ms Monica Parikh for applicants in C.S.Nos 7 and 67 of 2007

¶37

CORAM: SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J., & .D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J. Dated: 17^th August 2007

¶38

P.C.:

¶39

Chamber Summons Nos 7, 9, 10, and 67 (not on board, with

¶40

consent taken on board) are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) Liberty to amend the petition granted.

¶41

Chamber Summons No. 152 shall be heard alongwith the

¶42

-3-

¶43

main petition. Let the copies of the petition be supplied to the interveners within two weeks.

¶44

On the application from the Chartered Accountant i.e. C.V.K & Associates, issue notice to him to appear before the court and produce details of the work done by him so far, upon which appropriate order for release of his fees by the court will be passed. The Chartered Accountant be informed accordingly.

¶45

S.O to 28^th September 2007.

¶46

CHIEF JUSTICE

¶47

Dr. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.

Akhil Bhartiya Bhrashtachar Virodhi Samaj Punarnirman Samiti and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. and Veena Developers (Intervener)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhil Bhartiya Bhrashtachar Virodhi Samaj Punarnirman Samiti and Anr. v. State of Maharashtra and Ors. and Veena Developers (Intervener)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Maharashtra(Spl.Land Acq.Officer,Panvel) Vs Ishwarsharan Kedarnath Bhargava and Ors.

Dilawarkhan Pathan and Ors. Vs the Commissioner of Police and Ors.

Lovely Home Co-Op Hsg.Soc.Ltd and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

M/S. Atul Realty Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S. Constar Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd.

The Palm Acres Co-Operative Hsg. Soc. Ltd. Vs Shree Mulund Construction Co.

Varsha Dinesh Joshi and 5 Ors. Vs Harish Commercial Premises Co. Operative Society Ltd. and 11 Ors.