The High Court of Bombay disposed of the civil application by condoning a 50-day delay in filing the appeal as sufficiently explained, and listed the appeal for hearing on admission after six weeks.
Delay of 50 days condoned; appeal listed for hearing on admission after six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.219 OF 2007 IN
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL (ST.) NO.14630 OF 2007
Ashok Shankar Shilimkar
.. Applicant
v/s.
TATA Engineering and Locomotive
.. Respondent
Ms. Manisha Shekhar i/by M/s. J. Shekhar & Co. for the applicant. Mr. K.S. Bapat for the respondent.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. & DR. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 2ND NOVEMBER, 2007
P.C.
No reply has been filed. For the reasons stated in the application, prima facie, we are satisfied that the delay of 50 days caused in filing the appeal has been sufficiently explained. The averments made in the application are not disputed. Delay condoned. List the appeal for hearing on admission after six weeks.
Civil application stands disposed of accordingly.
CHIEF JUSTICE
DY. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 50 days in filing the appeal is sufficiently explained.
Whether the appeal can be condoned and listed for hearing on admission.
Ashok Shankar Shilimkar
TATA Engineering and Locomotive
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
