Dismissed

The Amarendra Coop.Hsg. Soty.Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra

Bombay HC20 Nov 2006WP/934/2000

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay heard this writ petition. Upon hearing counsel, the Court granted leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach appropriate authorities for reliefs. Rule discharged.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to adopt appropriate proceedings against appropriate authorities for appropriate reliefs.

The Amarendra Coop.Hsg. Soty.Ltd. Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2006)

¶1

 - 1 -

¶2

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
 WRIT PETITION NO.934 OF 2000

¶3

 The Amrendra Co-operative
 Housing Society Ltd. and Anr. ..Petitioners
 Vs.

¶4

 The State of Maharashtra
 and Ors. ..Respondents
 ...
 Mr.L.C.Chougule with Ms.S.S.Bhende i/b
 K.Choudhari for Petitioners
 Mr.P.Jadhav AGP for Respondents 1 to 4.
 Mr.V.Mahadik for Respondents 5 to 7.

¶5

 CORAM: DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ.
 DATE : NOVEMBER 20, 2006

¶6

P.C.

¶7

 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners
 and the learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 4 and
 learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 5 to 7.

¶8

 2. After hearing the parties for sometime, the
 learned counsel Mr.Chougule seeks leave to withdraw
 the petition with liberty to adopt appropriate
 proceedings against appropriate authorities for
 appropriate reliefs. Hence, Rule stands discharged
 with aforesaid liberty.

¶9

 [DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]

¶10

 - 2 -

¶11

 [SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]

The Amarendra Coop.Hsg. Soty.Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Amarendra Coop.Hsg. Soty.Ltd. v. the State of Maharashtra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr.Sarita K.Kumar Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Progressive Waterproofing Company Vs Mun.Corpn.for Greater Bombay and Ors.

Satish S.Sonalkar Vs Principal, New Law College and Ors.

Shri Jaysinh Vithaldas and Ors. Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Apple Finance Ltd. and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Kanchan G.Talreja Vs State of Maharashtra and Anr.