Petitioner's criminal writ petition dismissed as infructuous since he was released upon executing a bond, rendering the petition unsustainable.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION.
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.807 OF 2006
Amitkumar alias Munna Rameshwar
Pal : Petitioner.
versus
Special Executive Magistrate
and anr. : Respondents.
Mr.D.Dwivedi for the petitioner.
Mrs.A.S.Pai, APP, for the State.
CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE
V.K.TAHILRAMANI JJ.
DATED : APRIL 20, 2006.
P.C.
1. Counsel for the petitioner states that
upon execution of a bond, the petitioner has been
released and, therefore, this petition has become
infructuous. In view of this statement, the
petition does not survive. It is accordingly
dismissed as infructuous.
[D.G.DESHPANDE,J]
2
[V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J]
Amitkumar alias Munna Rameshwar Pal
Special Executive Magistrate
anr
D.G. DESHPANDE
V.K. TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court