Court allowed an application for restoration of a criminal writ petition dismissed on March 8, 2006, noting consent from the respondent's advocate. Petition to be placed for further hearing.
准予恢复此前被驳回的刑事撰写请愿书；案件已结案；主要请愿书定于 5 月 4 日聆讯。
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
..(1)..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.120 OF 2006
IN
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.211 OF 2001
Mr.Baseshwar K. Todkar ...Applicant.
Versus
Union of India
and Ors. ...Respondents.
Mr.A.N.Mulla, Advocate for the Applicant.
Smt.V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the State.
CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 19, 2006.
P.C.:
. This is an application for restoration of
the petition, which came to be dismissed by order
dated 8th March, 2006.
2. On that day the Advocate for respondent
No.1 was present. The Advocate for the petitioner
states that he has contacted with Mr.Lambay,
Advocate for respondent No.1 and Mr.Lambay,
Advocate had no objection to allow this
application. Upon this statement made by the
..(2)..
Advocate for the petitioner, the present
application is allowed. Criminal Application is
disposed of.
3. Petition be placed on 4th May, 2006 at 3:00
O’Clock.
(D.G.DESHPANDE, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Mr.Baseshwar K. Todkar
Union of India
D.G.DESHPANDE
V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court