Order condoning 67-day delay in Criminal Appeal due to jail term for life imprisonment. Bail application disposed in two weeks. Appeal admitted.
Delay of 67 days in filing appeal condoned. Appeal admitted. Bail application to be decided within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
..(1)..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.323 OF 2006
WITH
CRIMINAL APPLICATIN NO.324 OF 2006
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.308 OF 2006
Smt.Tarabai D. Barne ...Applicant/
Appellant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent.
. . .
Mr.Sagar V. Kothari, Advocate for the
Applicant-Appellant.
Mr.I.S.Thakur, APP, for the State.
. . .
CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 19, 2006.
P.C.:
. This is an application for condonation of
delay. There is delay of 67 days in filing the
appeal. The accused is in jail. He is convicted
for life imprisonment. Delay is satisfactorily
explained. In the circumstances, the delay is
condoned. Application is disposed of.
. Heard. Appeal No.308 of 2006 is admitted.
. As far as bail application is concerned,
S.O. two week.
(D.G.DESHPANDE, J.)
..(2)..
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal be condoned given that the accused is in jail and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Whether the application for bail needs individual adjudication.
Whether the appeal filed should be admitted despite the delay.
Smt.Tarabai D. Barne
The State of Maharashtra
D.G.DESHPANDE
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court