This single-paragraph disposal held that the petitioners' claim involved private grievances against Respondent No.5 and was not a fit case for the Court's extraordinary writ jurisdiction, leaving the remedy steps open to the parties. The petition was disposed of on these grounds.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 74 OF 2006
1. Arshie Complex Co.Op.Hsg.Sty.Ltd. ]
& Anr.] .. Petitioners
Versus
1. The Municipal Corpn. of Gr.Bombay ]
& 4 ors.
] .. Respondents
Mr. H.N. Thakore i/b Thakore Jariwala & Associates for
the petitioners.
Mrs. S. Ajit Kumar for the respondents No.1, 2 and 3.
Mr. S.V. Doijode i/b Doijode & Associates for
respondent No.4.
Mr. Rajiv Morey i/b Kumana & Co. for respondent No.5.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO &
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED: 06TH MARCH, 2006
P.C. :
.What the petitioners are canvassing before
this Court are private grievances that they have against
respondent No.5. This would, therefore, not be a fit
case to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. It
will be open to the petitioners to take such steps in
law, as available.
: 2 :
2.With the above observation, Writ Petition
stands disposed of.
Sd/-
[F.I. REBELLO, J.]
Sd/-
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
Arshie Complex Co.Op.Hsg.Sty.Ltd.
The Municipal Corpn. of Gr.Bombay
F.I. REBELLO
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court