This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 23 OF 2006
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 139 OF 2006
Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & ]
General Kamgar Union.] .. Petitioners
Versus
1. Security Guards Board for Gr.Bombay ]
and 2 ors.] .. Respondents
Mr. H.S.S. Murthy with Vaishali Bhilare for the
petitioners.
Mrs. Pallavi Divekar for the respondent No.1.
Mr. B.K. Ashok for the respondent No.2.
Ms. Sonia Sunil for the respondent No.3.
CORAM: F.I. REBELLO &
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED: 06TH MARCH, 2006
P.C. :
.As the Petition is disposed of, the relief as
prayed for cannot be considered. It will be open to the
petitioners to seek remedy against their purported
termination before the competent forum.
: 2 :
2.Motion disposed of accordingly.
Sd/-
[F.I. REBELLO, J.]
Sd/-
[ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.]
Maharashtra Rajya Suraksha Rakshak & General Kamgar Union
Security Guards Board for Gr.Bombay
F.I. REBELLO
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court