Javahar Nanchand Shah v. Dattu Gundu Parit
Bombay HCRPW/94/2006
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In a review application, the High Court at Bombay clarified that in a previous order, the reference to Section 17-B of the Bombay Tenancy Act should be read as Section 70-B of the same Act. The earlier order was confirmed subject to this modification.
What did the court decide?
Confirmed the earlier order subject to the modification that Section 17-B be read as Section 70-B of the Bombay Tenancy Act.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
¶2
REVIEW APPLICATION NO.94 OF 2006
IN
¶3
REVIEW APPLICATION NO.4692 OF 2006
¶4
-------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, office
Memoranda of Coram, Court’s or Judge’s orders
appearances, Court’s orders
or directions and
Registrar’s orders
¶5
-------------------------------------------------------
Mr.P.R.Arjunwadkar for the
applicant.
¶6
Mr.S.V.Sadavarte for the respondent
¶7
Coram : R.S.Mohite,J
¶8
Date : 25.7.2006.
¶9
PC
¶10
1. Heard both sides. In my
order dated 8.6.2006 passed in
Review Application No.4692/2006
the wording "Section 17-B of the
Bombay Tenancy Act may be read
as Section 70-B of the Bombay
Tenancy Act". Subject to this
modification my earlier order is
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the correct section for reading is Section 17-B or Section 70-B of the Bombay Tenancy Act.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Applicant
- respondent
Respondent
Coram
AI extract
R.S.Mohite
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court