This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORIGINAL SIDE
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.23 OF 2005
IN
WRIT PETITION (PIL) NO.3179 OF 2004
Mr.Jagdish Daswani & ors.Petitioners
vs.
The Principal Secretary,
Law and Judiciary Department,
Government of Maharashtra,
Mantralaya, Mumbai. & ors.Respondents
And
Babasaheb Gangadhar Damale Patil Applicant
Dr.Virendra Tulzapurkar with Mr.Subhash Jadhav
i/b.M/s.Desai & Chinoy for the petitioners.
Mr.R.M.Sawant, Government Pleader for respondents 1, 19
and 20.
Mr.V.C.Ghosalkar for the respondents 13 to 16.
Mr.V.M.Thorat i/b.Mr.P.N.Patil for the respondents 2 to
10, 12, 14, 15, 17, 18.
Mr.B.A.Jagoje for the applicant.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA &
ANOOP V. MOHTA, JJ.
DATED : 1st February 2006
P.C.
We find no justification in permitting the
applicant to intervene in the matter.
2. Chamber summons is rejected.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.)
Mr.Jagdish Daswani & ors
The Principal Secretary, Law and Judiciary Department, Government of Maharashtra, Mantralaya, Mumbai. & ors
Babasaheb Gangadhar Damale Patil
R.M. LODHA
ANOOP V. MOHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court