This short order addresses a Notice of Motion seeking to conjoin a delayed appeal. The Court condoned the twelve-day delay based on an affidavit and directed the office to process the appeal for admission.
The delay in filing the appeal was condoned and the appeal was directed to be processed for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3437 OF 2006
IN
APPEAL (Lodg.) NO. 711 of 2006
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1400 OF 2005
IN
DELHI SUIT NO. 1729 OF 1994
Ripan Wadhwa & another.... ..... Appellants.
Versus
M/s.Sun Pharmaceutical Industries
Limited. ..... ... ... Respondent.
Mr.Sarosh Bharucha i/by Mr. Avesh Kayser
for the Appellants.
Mr.Sanjay Udeshi i/by M/s.Sanjay Udeshi & Co.,
for the Respondent.
CORAM : R. M. LODHA, and
S. A. BOBDE, JJ.
DATED : 5TH DECEMBER, 2006.
P.C.:
Heard.
2. The appeal suffers from delay of 12 days.
-: 2 :-
Affidavit in support of notice of motion sufficiently
explains the delay.
3. We, accordingly, condone the delay in filing the appeal.
4. Office is directed to process the appeal and place it for admission.
5. Notice of Motion stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(R. M. LODHA, J.)
Sd/-
(S. A. BOBDE, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the appeal warrants condonation.
Whether the Notice of Motion stands coupled with the Appeal.
Ripan Wadhwa
M/s.Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
R. M. LODHA
S. A. BOBDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court