In Appeal No. 852 of 2006 arising from Suit No. 2629 of 2006, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the appeal in limine because no interference was called for in the impugned order.
Appeal dismissed in limine; hearing of Notice of Motion expedited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 852 OF 2006
IN
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3181 OF 2006
IN
SUIT NO. 2629 OF 2006
Miss Lija Malik
] .. Appellant
(Ori.Plaintiff)
Versus
1. M/s. Gupta Music Co. & Anr.] .. Respondents
(Ori.Defendants)
Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the appellant.
CORAM: R.M. LODHA, &
S.A. BOBDE, JJ.
DATED: 04TH DECEMBER, 2006
P.C. :
. Heard Mr. A.M. Saraogi, the counsel for theappellant.
2. No interference is called for in the impugned
order.
3. Appeal is dismissed in limine.
4. Hearing of the Notice of Motion is expedited.
Sd/-
Sd/-
: 2 :
[S.A. BOBDE, J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal raising no point of substance requires any interference.
Miss Lija Malik
M/s. Gupta Music Co. & Anr.
R.M. Lodha
S.A. Bobde
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court