Abu Malik v. Sushmita Sen
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal was dismissed at threshold because the appellant abandoned his challenge after candidly admitting no claim existed against the foreign firm in his affidavit.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order stands upheld.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 861 OF 2006
IN
ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 389 OF 2006
Abu Malik] .. Appellant
(Ori.Respondent)
Versus
Sushmita Sen] .. Respondent
(Ori.Petitioner)
Mr. A.M. Saraogi for the appellant.
Mr. Pratik Sakseria i/b M/s. B. Munim & Co. for the
respondent.
CORAM: R.M. LODHA, &
S.A. BOBDE, JJ.
DATED: 04TH DECEMBER, 2006
P.C. :
.Heard.
2.Mr. A.M. Saraogi, the counsel for the
appellant does not dispute that the appellant, in his
Affidavit in the Arbitration Petition, has stated that
he has no intention to claim any amount lying with M/s.
Navy Impex LLC. In this view of the matter, we find no
occasion for the appellant to challenge the impugned
order, particularly in the light of the categorical
statement made by the learned counsel that Anand Pan
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Abu Malik
- respondent
Sushmita Sen
Coram
R.M. LODHA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court