The application for condonation of a 50-day delay in filing a criminal appeal was disposed of. The delay was found satisfactorily explained, and the appeal was admitted.
Delay of 50 days in filing appeal condoned; Criminal Appeal No.393 of 2006 admitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
..(1)..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE SIDE, JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.424 OF 2006
WITH
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.393 OF 2006
Kanthuram Babu Mokashi ...Applicant/
Appellant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent.
Mr.Indrajeet Joshi, Advocate for the
Applicant-Appellant.
Smt.V.R.Bhosale, APP, for the State.
. . .
CORAM : D.G.DESHPANDE AND
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 19, 2006.
P.C.:
. This is an application for condonation of
delay. There is delay of 50 days in filing the
appeal. The accused is in jail. He is convicted
for life imprisonment. Delay is satisfactorily
explained. In the circumstances, the delay is
condoned. Application is disposed of.
. Heard. Appeal No.393 of 2006 is admitted.
(D.G.DESHPANDE, J.)
(SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.)
Kanthuram Babu Mokashi
State of Maharashtra
D.G.Deshpande
Smt.V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court