This court disposed of an appeal on consent terms submitted by the parties. No costs were awarded.
Appeal disposed of in terms of consent terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
APPEAL NO. 139 of 2006
IN
SUMMONS FOR JUDGMENT NO. 892 OF 2005
IN
SUMMARY SUIT NO. 2004 OF 2004
M/s.GMS Technologies Ltd........... Appellant.
Versus
M/s. Plastika Enterprises.... .. Respondents.
Ms.Nitya Suneel i/by M/s.Nitya Suneel & Associates
for the Appellant.
Mr. S.P.Kanuga i/by M/s.Kanuga & Kanuga
for the Respondents.
CORAM : R. M. LODHA, and
S. A. BOBDE, JJ.
DATED : 5TH DECEMBER, 2006.
P.C.:
The Counsel for the parties handed in consent
terms, marked "X" for identification purposes.
2. We perused the consent terms and find that the
same is in the interest of the parties.
-: 2 :-
3. We, accordingly, dispose of the appeal in terms of
the consent terms.
4. No costs.
Sd/-
(R. M. LODHA, J.)
Sd/-
(S. A. BOBDE, J.)
M/s.GMS Technologies Ltd
M/s. Plastika Enterprises
R. M. LODHA
S. A. BOBDE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court