The High Court of Bombay disposed of a writ petition filed by Ex.Commodore Narinder M. Pandit, holding that no clarification was needed as the petition did not challenge an impugned order disposed of earlier on June 10, 2004.
The application stands disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPLICATION NO.3510 OF 2004
IN
WRIT PETITION (CRI) NO.1586 OF 2004
Ex.Commodore Narinder M.Pandit .. Petitioner
Versus
1. The Union of India and Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Ajay P. Singh for the petitioner
Mr.I.S.Thakur, A.P.P. for the State
Mr.D.N.Salvi for Union of India
CORAM: A.P.SHAH &
S.U.KAMDAR, JJ
DATED: 2ND SEPTEMBER, 2004
P.C.:
1. Heard Advocates.
2. In our opinion, no clarification is required in
as much as the order of 8th June 2004 was not the
subject matter of the petition which was disposed
of by us on 10th June 2004. It is needless to say
that it will be open for the petitioner to
challenge the order dated 8th June 2004 by adopting
appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.
3. Application stands disposed of accordingly.
Ex.Commodore Narinder M. Pandit
The Union of India and Ors.
A.P. Shah
S.U. Kamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court