Petitioner dismissed. Court held no necessity to transfer investigation or interfere, as criminal complaint arose from civil dispute involving allegations of forgery.
None; petitioner's petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY |
|---|
| CRIMINAL APPELALTE JURISDICTION |
| CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.1159 OF 2004 |
| Smt.Sheela Rani Nandpal ...Petitioner |
| Vs. |
| Mr.Sunil Kumar Nandpal and |
| others ...Respondents |
| .... Mr.A.P.Mundergi with Mr.W.N.Yande with Mr.S.A.Sawant |
| for Petitioner |
| Mr.Mukesh Ahooja for Respondent no.1 |
| Mr.C.M.Lokesh i/b M/s. G.S.Hegde & Associates |
| for Respondent nos.2 and 3. |
| Mr.K.V.Reddy for Respondent no.5. |
| Mr.I.S.Thakur, A.P.P. for Respondent nos.8 & 9. .... |
| CORAM : H.L.GOKHALE AND SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,JJ. |
| DATE : AUGUST 10,2004 |
| P.C.: |
| 1. Heard Mr.Mundergi with Mr.Yande and Mr.Sawant for |
| Petitioner. Mr.Ahooja appears for respondent no.1. |
| Mr.Lokesh appears for respondent nos.2 and 3. |
Mr.Reddy appears for respondent no.5. Mr.Thakur
appears for respondent nos.8 and 9.
| 2. | The | petition | is | essenti | ally concerned with |
civil |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| transaction | and | is | arising | out |
of civil |
dispute |
| between | the | parties. | Ho | wever, | the petitioner |
has |
| sought |
to all |
ege forge |
ry |
and | that is why |
the |
| complaint | has | been | filed | in | the concerned Court |
of |
| Metropolitan | Magistrate. | The | concerned | Police | ||
| Station | was | asked to |
make | a | report and then |
after |
-2-
| their | report, they hav |
e | filed cha |
rge-shee | t. | It |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| appears | that petitioner-mother |
did | not wa |
nt | two | other |
| sons | to be involved in |
the | allegations | which | she | was |
| making | against the respon |
dent | no.1-son. | The | police | |
| on | their investigation, |
have | found | some | material | |
| against | them and have |
filed | charge-sheet. | They | have | |
| also | sent necessary |
documents | du | ring | the | |
| investigati | on to the hand |
writing | expert. | It | will | be |
open to them to file additional charge sheet after
receipt of the report from handwriting expert.
the investigation. Petition is dismissed.
. Certified copy expedited.
[ H.L.GOKHALE,J. ]
[ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
Smt.Sheela Rani Nandpal
Mr.Sunil Kumar Nandpal
H.L.GOKHALE
SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
