The Court dismissed a criminal writ petition. It directed the petitioner to file a complaint before the Magistrate regarding the grievances raised but declined to exercise further writ jurisdiction.
Petitioner directed to file complaint before Magistrate; writ jurisdiction not exercised further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
| IN | TH | E HI |
GH COUR |
T OF J |
UDICATU | RE AT B |
OMBAY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C |
RIMINA |
L | APPELAL |
TE |
JURISD |
ICTION |
|
| CRIMI | NAL | WRIT | PETITION | NO.1 | 404 OF |
2004 | |
| Abdul |
Razzaq | Abdul |
Sattar | ||||
| Momin | ..P | etitioner | |||||
| Vs. | |||||||
| The others |
State | of ...Re |
Mahara spondents |
shtra | and | ||
| Mr.Dholkiya Petitioner |
with | Mr.W | .... ajed I.S |
haikh | Advocate | for | |
| Ms.P.H.Kant | haria | A.P | .P. .... |
for | State. | ||
| CORAM DATE |
: SMT.V.K.T : |
H.L.G AHILRAM A |
OKHALE ANI,JJ. UGUST |
AND 10,2004 |
|||
| P.C.: | |||||||
| . | Mr.Dh | olkiya | for the |
petitioner. | It | will be |
open |
| for t |
he | petitio | ner to |
file |
complaint | before | the |
| Magistrate | for | the | grievan |
ces which |
are | raised in |
the |
| petition. | We | do not |
find any |
reason | that this |
Court | |
| should give | any dir | ection i | n exercise of | writ |
jurisdiction. Petition is dismissed.
[ H.L.GOKHALE,J. ]
[ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J.]
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to exercise writ jurisdiction to direct the petitioner to file a complaint before the Magistrate.
Abdul Razzaq Abdul Sattar Momin
State of Maharashtra
H.L.Gokhale
Smt.V.K.Tahilramani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
