FPA-PMLA-2496/MUM/2018 of Smt. Monica Maluka v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Smt. Monica Maluka V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR SAFEMA, FEMA, NDPS, PMLA & PBPT ACT AT NEW DELHI
| 1. MP-PMLA-5836/MUM/2019 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-5821/MUM/2019 (E.H.) In MP-PMLA-4853/MUM/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2496/MUM/2018 |
||
|---|---|---|
| Smt. Monica Maluka | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| 2. MP-PMLA-5837/MUM/2019 (Misc.) MP-PMLA-5822/MUM/2019 (E.H.) In MP-PMLA-4854/MUM/2018 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-2497/MUM/2018 |
||
| Shri Robinson Duggal | … | Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | ||
| The Deputy Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the Appellants | : Ms. Mannat Singh and Sh Chetan Pandya, Advocates |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Sh. S. K. Sharma, Advocate |
| CORAM SMT. ANANYA RAY |
: MEMBER |
| ORDER 07.03.2019 |
FPA-PMLA-2496 & 2497/MUM/2018
The learned counsels for the appellants Ms. Mannat Singh with Sh. Chetan Pandya appeared. They stated that they have filed an application for transfer of this case to the bench of Chairman/Division Bench although on the last occasion, it was made very clear that this case is not against the same OC which was before the Chairman/Division Bench and hence there are no grounds for transfer. The counsel for the appellant also seeks time till 11th March, 2019 to file their rejoinder as they have received the reply today. Allowed.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Monica Maluka
- appellant
Shri Robinson Duggal
- respondent
The Deputy Director
- respondent
Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
18 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court