FPA-PMLA-1904/LKW/2017 of Vinod Kumar Goel v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Case brief
What is this about?
Vinod Kumar Goel V/s The Joint Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
1. FPA-PMLA-1904/LKW/2017 Vinod Kumar Goel … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent & 2. FPA-PMLA-1905/LKW/2017 Tirupati Construction … Appellant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Sumit Kumar, Proxy counsel For the Respondent : Mr. Nitesh Rana, S.P.P. Mr. A.R. Aditya, Advocate Ms. Sanjana Rajput, Advocate
CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER
16.12.2019
FPA-PMLA-1904/LKW/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1905/LKW/2017
Shri Sumit Kumar, proxy counsel appearing for the main counsel of the appellant is present. Shri Nitesh Rana, learned counsel for the respondent is also present. The learned counsel for the respondent is seeking four weeks time to file the replies to the applications. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to be served on the other side.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vinod Kumar Goel
- appellant
Tirupati Construction
- respondent
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · December
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1904/LKW/2017
- Topic
- Money Laundering
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court