Orders allowing the respondent time to file written synopsis in two appeals under the PMLA, directing parties to file by the next date and listing for April 2020.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) FPA-PMLA-1331/JP/2016 Shri Shiv Charan Hedasons … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
&
Shri Shiv Charan Heda & Sons & Anr. … Appellants/Applicants
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : None For the Respondent : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : ACTING CHAIRMAN
ORDER
06.12.2019
FPA-PMLA-1331/JP/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1971/JP/2017
Written synopsis have not yet been filed. The respondent is seeking time to file written synopsis. The same is considered and
allowed.
The parties are allowed to file the written synopsis by the next
date.
List on 17th April, 2020.
(G. C. Mishra) Acting Chairman
New Delhi, 06th December, 2019
‘AS’
FPA-PMLA-1331/JP/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1971/JP/2017
Page 1 of 1
Shri Shiv Charan Hedasons
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
G. C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
