The Appellate Tribunal listed the appeal for a single day. The respondent's advocate sought an adjournment on behalf of a co-counsel who was absent. The matter was postponed to February 15, 2017. No final decision on the appeal or delay condonation is recorded in this text.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2698/JP/2016 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1331/JP/2016
Shiv Charan Hedasons … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Bhagabhati Prasad, Advocate For the respondent : Sh. Neeraj Atri, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
27.01.2017
MP-PMLA-2698/JP/2016 (COD)
The appellant has filed the application for condonation of delay of
88 days in filing the appeal. The reply has been filed by the respondent. Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, advocate is not present, Mr. Neeraj Atri, Advocate seeks an adjournment on her behalf which is not opposed by the appellant.
List on 15th February, 2017.
FPA-PMLA-1331/JP/2016
Re-notify the matter.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 27th January, 2017
‘K’
Page 1 of 1
FPA-PMLA-1331/JP/2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone the delay of 88 days in filing the appeal.
Shiv Charan Hedasons
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
