The Appellate Tribunal allowed parties an extension of four weeks to file written submissions in appeal applications under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. No written submissions were filed by either side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
Shri Shiv Charan Hedasons
… Appellant/Applicant
Shri Shiv Charan Heda & Sons & Anr. … Appellants/Applicants
Versus
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the Appellants : Mr. Achintya Dvivedi, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM SHRI G. C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
09.08.2019
FPA-PMLA-1971/JP/2017 & FPA-PMLA-1331/JP/2016
Parties were directed to file the written submissions. Neither of them filed the same. On the request of the parties, one more opportunity is granted to file the written synopsis within four weeks.
List on 6th December, 2019.
(G. C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 09th August, 2019
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1331/JP/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1971/JP/2017
Page 1 of 1
Shri Shiv Charan Hedasons
Shri Shiv Charan Heda & Sons & Anr.
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
G. C. MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
