Appellants moved before the Appellate Tribunal, PMLA, India against an acquittal order. The court listed the matter for further proceedings and adjourned the hearing to allow the respondent to verify the position.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
(1) MP-PMLA-423/HYD/2013 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-466/HYD/2013 Madala Ramesh … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
(2) MP-PMLA-407/HYD/2013 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-461/HYD/2013 K. Sarath Babi … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : (Counsel Appeared) For the respondent : Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN
ORDER
06.08.2018
FPA-PMLA-466/HYD/2013 & FPA-PMLA-461/HYD/2013
The learned counsel for the appellant has admitted that the
advocate has filed the appeal against the acquittal order of the appellant.
The learned counsel for the respondent seeks time to verify the position.
List on 25th February, 2019.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
New Delhi, 6th August, 2018
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-466 & 461/HYD/2013
Page 1 of 1
Madala Ramesh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
K. Sarath Babi
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
