This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-407/HYD/2013 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-461/HYD/2013
K. Sarath Babu … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 27.02.2017
FPA-PMLA-461/HYD/2013
Shri S.A. Saud, the learned counsel for the respondent states that the judgment order dated 9th May, 2016 passed by the Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad has not been challenged by the State as of today. His submission is that despite of that the proceeding against the appellant under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act would continue. Since no one appears on behalf of the appellant; list on 11th July, 2017.
FPA-PMLA-461/HYD/2013
Page 1 of 2
Copy of the order be sent to the appellant and his counsel as none
has appeared on his behalf or his counsel.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 27th February, 2017
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-461/HYD/2013
Page 2 of 2
K. Sarath Babu
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
