B.Ram Prasad v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Maintainability of writ petition against order/proceedings akin to Section 145 Cr.P.C.; alternative remedy — revision under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C.; Section 397(2) interlocutory-order bar not attracted; Article 226 jurisdiction vs revisional jurisdiction. Parties: B. Ram Prasad (petitioner) v. State of Andhra Pradesh (Revenue Department), SHO Jupadu Bunglow Police Station, RDO Kurnool, Tahasildar/Mandal Executive Magistrate Jupadu Bunglow, Shaik Farooq Basha. Impugned order: MC.No.2/2019 dated 11.1.2019 (based on letter dated 10.01.2019). Case followed: W.P.No.18784 of 2021 (order dated 06.09.2021), which internally cites Criminal Petition (SR) No.5836 of 2021. Disposition: dismissed, petitioner directed to revision under S.397(1) Cr.P.C., no costs, miscellany closed. Bench: Smt. Justice Sumathi Jagadam; decided 02-04-2026.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner is at liberty to avail the remedy of revision under Section 397(1) Cr.P.C. to challenge the impugned order/proceedings; no order as to costs.