Ramu Naidu Paluri v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
W.P. No. 27675/2017, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, Maheswara Rao Kuncheam J., decided 02.03.2026: writ petition under Article 226 by three businessmen against the State of A.P., SHO J.R. Puram Police Station and Assistant Director of Mines and Geology, Srikakulam, challenging seizure of vehicles AP 31TH 4549, AP 35X 3388 and AP 37TB 3627 as violative of Articles 19 and 21; vehicles already in interim custody pursuant to interim order dated 18.08.2017; writ petition disposed of with liberty to respondents to initiate steps under Rules 19, 20 & 21 of G.O.Ms.No.100 Industries & Commerce (Mines-II) Department dated 26.06.2025; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions (including Section 151 CPC IA) closed.
What did the court decide?
No substantive adjudication on the legality of the seizure; the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to the respondents to initiate appropriate steps under Rules 19, 20 and 21 of G.O.Ms.No.100 dated 26.06.2025; the vehicles remain with the petitioners in interim custody pursuant to the interim order dated 18.08.2017; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.