Disposed¶27

Manupati Sai Teja v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC18 Jan 2026CRLP/8/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Manupati Sai Teja v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.; Criminal Petition No. 8/2026; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Dr. Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa; decided 19.01.2026; accused/petitioner Padala Venkata Sriram Reddy; K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor; respondents include Maddipatla Reddamma (complainant), Rayachoty Urban P.S.; disposal with liberty to file default bail application before trial Court; entitlement left to be determined under law by trial Court; no statute or precedent cited; no quantum involved.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the trial Court for default bail, if entitled to such bail under law. ¶27

Manupati Sai Teja Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

APHC010722592025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

[3396]

¶6

MONDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

¶9

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8/2026

¶10

Between:

¶11

MANUPATI SAI TEJA, S/O. SURESH,AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS,R/O. D.NO.3-1-9-126, NEAR RK SCHOOL,HARIPRASAD NAGAR, CHIRALA TOWN AND MANDAL,BAPATLA DISTRICT.

¶12

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶13

AND

¶14

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, S.H.O, RAYACHOTY URBAN P.S,GUNTUR DISTRICT,REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI.

¶15

MADDIPATLA REDDAMMA, W/O. CHINNAIAH NAIDU,AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. HOUSEWIFE,R/O. THIPPANNAGARI PALLI, H/O. GALIVARIPALLI VILLAGE,K.V. PALLI MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

¶16

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

¶18

1.PADALA VENKATA SRIRAM REDDY

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

¶20

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶21

The Court made the following:

¶22

¶23

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8 OF 2026

¶24

ORDER:-

¶25

Mr. P. V. S. Sriram Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the petition may be disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the learned trial Court seeking default bail.

¶26

Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.

¶27

Considering the submissions made and upon perusal of the material on record, the present Criminal Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the trial Court for default bail, if he is entitled to such bail under law.

¶28

___________________________________ DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J

¶29

Date: 19.01.2026 S D P

¶30

¶31

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

¶32

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8 OF 2026

¶33

19.01.2026

¶34

S D P

Manupati Sai Teja v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manupati Sai Teja v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

B Geetha Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Ravi Kumar Pilli Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Siri Nivasam Mutually Aided Cooperative House Building Society Limited Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Pandu alias Mandalapu Gopi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Jajula Thirupathaiah Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Mandapati Venkata Jagannadha Subrahmanyan Raju, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh