Budida Kanaka Raju, v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissed as infructuous; writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus against police inaction in investigation of Crime No. 234 of 2018, Anakapalli Town Police Station, Visakhapatnam District; allegation of violation of Article 14; IA No. 1 of 2019 under Section 151 CPC; cause does not survive; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed; Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; Justice B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi; decided 4 December 2025; petitioner Budida Kanaka Raju; counsel Ravi Teja / Y. Sudhakar; Assistant Government Pleader for Home R. Mallikarjuna Rao.
What did the court decide?
Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner (Sri Ravi Teja representing Sri Y. Sudhakar) that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs.