Palem Goutham Chandra Kanth v. the State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous dismissal of an Article 226 writ petition alleging police interference in civil disputes: Sub Inspector of Police, Ramapuram P.S. (Kadapa District) allegedly summoned petitioners Palem Goutham Chandra Kanth and Palem Krishna Priya to the police station at the behest of private respondents C V Ramana Rao and P Bindu Latha for settlement of civil cases and threatened them; mandamus and S.151 CPC interlocutory applications (IA Nos. 1 and 2 of 2019, including vacation of interim order dated 25.04.2019 in W.P No. 5767/2018) sought; petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that the cause does not survive; no order as to costs; pending IAs closed; single judge, Justice B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, 03.12.2025.
What did the court decide?
Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and has become infructuous, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous, with no order as to costs.