Disposed¶30

T Mallama v. Station House Officer

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Oct 2025WP/32/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

AP High Court, Amaravati - WRIT PETITION NO. 32 OF 2021, T MALLAMA v. Station House Officer and others, decided 08.10.2025 by Dr Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa. Mandamus sought for registration of a complaint dated 13.04.2019 and investigation of alleged illegal acts (invoking Articles 14, 21 and the Scheduled Caste and scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989); IA under Section 151 CPC for interim direction. Disposed of after Assistant Government Pleader for Home stated petitioner never approached the police; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; no cases cited.

What did the court decide?

None; the writ petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, were directed to stand closed. ¶30

T Mallama Vs Station House Officer — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010000422021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 32 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

T MALLAMA, Tirumalapudi Satyanarayana Age. 60, Charana das puram, Saravakota Mandal, Dilakukan District

¶8

...Petitioner

¶9

AND

¶10

STATION HOUSE OFFICER, rep it s principal secretary Secretariat, Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District

¶11

Station House Officer, Station House officer, Trikal, Dilakukan District

¶12

Superintendent of Police, Superintendent of Police, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District

¶13

...Respondents

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or directions or particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondents No. 1 and 2 is not registering the complaint and not investigating the illegal acts of the aforementioned persons as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law violative of article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India as well as the Scheduled Caste and

¶15

scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, in the interest of justice and to pass

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to register the offense, by conducting necessary investigations forthwith, based on the complaint dated 13.04.2019 of the petitoner, in the interest of Justice pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: A SURYA RAO

¶19

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME

¶20

The Court made the following order:

¶21

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

¶22

WRIT PETITION NO: 32 of 2021

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India

¶25

with the following prayer for:

¶26

“…to issue any writ order or directions or particularly a writ in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 in not registering the complaint and not investigating the illegal acts of the aforementioned persons as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law violative of article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India as well as the Scheduled Caste and scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, in the interest of justice.”

¶27

Heard Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for respondents. None represented for the petitioner.

¶28

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit

¶29

that the petitioner has not approached the police for giving oral information or written complaint. Hence, the police have not taken any action in this mater.

¶30