Dismissed¶31

T Chandrakala v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Jul 2025WP/2038/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition withdrawal; Article 226 mandamus; challenge to Joint Collector proceedings D.Dis.DS.1087/2024 dated 07-01-2025; land Ac.3.36 cents Sy.No.353-1 Kothapalli Kourugunta Village, Dagardarthi Mandal, SPSR Nellore District; Articles 14, 19, 21, 300-A; Section 151 CPC suspension application (I.A. No. 1 of 2025); dismissed as withdrawn; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; Justice Subba Reddy Satti; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; 18-07-2025.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; Writ Petition No. 2038/2025 dismissed as withdrawn; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions (including I.A. No. 1 of 2025 under Section 151 CPC seeking suspension of the impugned order) stood closed. ¶31

T Chandrakala Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶31

Issue for consideration

Whether the proceedings No. D.Dis.DS.1087/2024 dated 07-01-2025 passed by the 3rd respondent pertaining to the petitioner's land (Ac.3.36 cents in Sy.No.353-1 of Kothapalli Kourugunta Village, Dagardarthi Mandal, Nellore District) are illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution (issue raised by the writ petition; not adjudicated as the petition was withdrawn).

¶21

Ratio / Principle

The Court accorded permission to learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.

¶30

Key takeaways

The Writ Petition was dismissed as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.ratio¶31
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.ratio¶32

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

T Chandrakala v. State of AP & others, Writ Petition No. 2038/2025, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati (Subba Reddy Satti, J.), decided 18-07-2025. The petitioner, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, sought a writ of mandamus to declare illegal, arbitrary and violative of natural justice and of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A the proceedings No. D.Dis.DS.1087/2024 dated 07-01-2025 passed by the 3rd respondent (Joint Collector) concerning her land of Ac.3.36 cents in Sy.No.353-1 of Kothapalli Kourugunta Village, Dagardarthi Mandal, Nellore District, and to set aside the same. An interlocutory application (I.A. No. 1 of 2025) under Section 151 CPC sought suspension of the impugned order. At admission stage, learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave to withdraw; the Court accorded permission, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, made no order as to costs, and closed pending miscellaneous petitions, if any. No merits adjudication; no precedent value beyond the withdrawal/disposal.

¶1

[3331]

¶2

APHC010037282025

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

FRIDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 2038/2025

¶9

Between:

¶10

T CHANDRAKALA, W/O.NATARAJAMURTHI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO. 1-455, VENKATACHALAM VILLAGE, VENKATACHALAM MANDAL,SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE.

¶15

THE JOINT COLLECTOR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE.

¶16

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KAVALI REVENUE DIVISION, KAVALI, KAVALI DISTRICT.

¶17

THE TAHSILDAR, DAGARDARTHI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶18

KANUPURU SUDHAALAKSHMI, W/O PARDHASARADHI AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O.D.NO. 4-2, GOGINENIPURAM, GUDURU MANDAL,TIRUPATI DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶19

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the assailing the order the proceedings No. D.Dis.DS.1087/2024 dated 07-01-2025 passed by the 3rd

¶21

respondent pertaining the petitioners land an extent of an extent of Ac.3.36 cents in Sy.No.353-1 of Kothapalli Kourugunta Village of Dagardarthi Mandal, Nellore District, is as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principle of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the proceedings No. D.Dis.D5.1087/2024 dated 07-01-2025 passed by the 3rd respondent pertaining the petitioners land an extent of an extent of Ac.3.3S cents in Sy.No.353-1 of Kothapalli Kourugunta Village of Dagardarthi Mandal, Nellore District, and pass

¶22

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the order in proceedings No. D.Dis.DS. 1087/2024 dated 07-01-2025 passed by the 3rd respondent pertaining the petitioner’s land an extent of an extent of Ac.3.36 cents in Sy.No.353-1 of Kothapalli Kourugunta Village of Dagardarthi Mandal, Nellore District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶25

1.KOTHA LEELA GANESH RAGHAVENDRA

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶27

1.GP FOR REVENUE

¶28

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.