Chintakayala Ramanna Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring the action of the Respondents in seeking to dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac. 1.10 gts in Sy No. 243-3 (243- lA) of Kodapaganipalli Village, Kothacheruvu Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District, without issuing any notice and without following the due process

¶18

Page 2 of 4

¶19

SRS,J W.P.No.13413 of 2025

¶20

of law, as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and Consequently restrain the Respondents from their illegal attempts and pass

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue interim directions to the Respondents not to interfere or dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring Ac. 1.10 gts in Sy No. 243-3 10 (243lA) of Kodapaganipalli Village, Kothacheruvu Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District, pending disposal of W P No. of 2025 and pass

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶24

1.N RANGA REDDY

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶26

1.GP FOR REVENUE

¶27

The Court made the following:

¶28

:: ORDER ::

¶29

The above writ petition has been filed to declare the action of respondent No.4 in trying to dispossess the petitioner from an extent of Ac.1.10 cents in Sy.No.243-3 of Kodapaganipalli Village, Kothacheruvu Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District, as illegal and arbitrary.

¶30

Heard Sri N. Ranga Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri G. Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appeared for the respondents.

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that an extent of Ac.1.10 cents in Sy.No.243-3 of Kodapaganipalli Village, Kothacheruvu Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District, was assigned to the petitioner vide D.A.R.Dis:14/1412, dated 30.09.2002 (Ex.P1). The Revenue authorities updated the Record of Rights and mutated the name of the petitioner in

¶32

Page 3 of 4

¶33

SRS,J W.P.No.13413 of 2025

¶34

revenue records, and issued a passbook vide Ex.P3. He would also submit that respondent No.4 is trying to dispossess the petitioner without issuing any notice.

¶35

An interim order was granted on 15.05.2025, and the same is in operation.

¶36

Sri G. Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that respondent No.4 is not interfering with the petitioner’s possession of the property and respondent No.4 will follow the due process of law.

¶37

Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without touching the merits of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, with the consent of both the learned counsel, directing respondent No.4 not to interfere with an extent of Ac.1.10 cents in Sy.No.243-3 of Kodapaganipalli Village, Kothacheruvu Mandal, Sri Sathya Sai District, without following due process of law. No order as to costs.

¶38

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶39

___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI

¶40

Date : 18.07.2025 TVN

¶41

Page 4 of 4

¶42

SRS,J W.P.No.13413 of 2025

¶43

361