Dismissed

Sri Koundinya Educational Society, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC11 Feb 2024WP/906/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati heard a writ petition challenging refusal to ratify student admissions under convener quota. Recording the submittee that the cause has become infructuous, the court dismissed the petition and closed pending miscellaneous applications.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs; pending miscellaneous applications stood closed.

Sri Koundinya Educational Society, Vs… — Education and Admissions | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

MONDAY. THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶6

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 906 OF 2014

¶8

Between:

¶9

Sri Koundinya Educational Society, NH-5, Chaitanya Knowledge Oily, Velugubanda village Rajanagaram Mandal, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District-533 296, Represented by its Managing Director K. Sasi Kiran Varma.

¶10

Godavari Institute of Engineering & Technology, (2" Shift Polytechnic), NH-5, Chaitanya Knowledge City, Velugubanda village Rajanagaram Mandal. Rajahmundry, East Godavari District-533 296, Represented by its Managing Director K. Sasi Kiran Varma.

¶11

K. Sasi Kiran Varma, S/o. K.V.V. Satyanarayana Raju, Aged about 33 years, Rio. Plot No. A3, Road No. 5, Filmnagar Phase 2, Apollo Backside, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500 033.

¶12

...PETITIONERS

¶13

AND

¶14

Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶15

The Convener, Admissions, POLYCET-2013, Hyderabad.

¶16

Secretary, State Board of Technical Education & Training, Hyderabad.

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction; more particularly, one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 2'^'^ respondent

¶19

<-r in refusing to ratify the list of students admitted to the 2 nd Petitioner institution under convener quota in ECE, CME, EEE and Mining branches in ,the academic year 2013-14 as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and contrary ; t6>;^fhe^ of presidential Order, 1974, and further direct the 'iV fesp’^ndehts to consider all the admissions made by^{the2'^'^Petitionerinleft} ■Si. over s.ea^s as valid and approve the admissions made by the Petitioners.

¶20

I.A. NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 11048 OF 2014)

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3^'^ Respondent Board to issue hall tickets to all the students admitted to the Polytechnic^courses in the 2 nd Petitioner institution in the academic year 2013-14 and to permit them to appear in the ensuing 15^^ Year Polytechnic examination^as also declare their results pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶22

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 990 OF 2014)

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to ratify^{thelistofstudents} admitted by the 2"'^ Petitioner and to treat the same as valid for all purposes including appearing in the examinations, pending the disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶25

Ms. K.TANUSHA REPRESENTING

¶26

SRI. S. NIRANJAN REDDY

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2: GP FOR HIGHER^EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI P.V.S.S.S. RAMA^RAO The Court made the following: ORDER

¶28

tv-

¶29

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶30

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶31

MONDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶32

PRESENT

¶33

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA

¶34

WRIT PETITION NO; 906 OF 2014

¶35

Between:

¶36

Sri Koundinya Educational Society,, NH-5, Chaitanya Knowledge Oily, Velugubanda village Rajanagaram Mandal, Rajahmundiy, East Godavari District-533 296, Represented by its Managing Director K. Sasi Kiran Varma.

¶37

Godavari Institute of Engineering 85 Technology, (2"^Shift Polytechnic), NH-5, Chaitanya Knowledge City, Velugubanda village Rajanagaram Mandal, Raj^mundiy, East Godavari District-533 296, Represented by its Managing Director K. Sasi Kiran^Varma.

¶38

K. Sasi Kiran Varma,, S/o. K.V.V. Satyanarayana Raju, Aged about 33 years, Rio. Plot No. A3, Road No. 5, Filmnagar Phase 2, Apollo Backside, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad 500 033.

¶39

...PETITIONER(S)

¶40

AND

¶41

Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

¶42

The Convener Admissions, POLYCET-2013, Hyderabad.

¶43

Secretary, State Board of Technical Education 85 Training, Hyderabad.

¶44

...RESPONDENTS

¶45

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue^aWrit, Order or Direction; more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of "Mandamus" declaring the action of the 2" respondent in refusing

¶46

¶47

to ratify the list of students admitted to the 2nd Petitioner institution under convener quota in ECE, CME, EEE and Mining branches in the academic year 2013-14 as illegal, arbitrary unconstitutional and contrary to the provision of presidential Order, 1974, and further direct the respondents to consider all the admissions made by the 2nd Petitioner in left over seats as valid and approve the admissions made by the Petitioners and pass.

¶48

LA. NO; 4 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 11048 OF 20141

¶49

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent Board to issue hall tickets to all the students admitted to the Polytechnic courses in the 2nd Petitioner institution in the academic year 2013-14 and to permit them^to appear in the ensuing 15t Year Polytechnic examination as also declare their results pending disposal of the writ petition

¶50

LA. NO; 6 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 101814 OF 2014)

¶51

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

¶52

I.A. NO; 1 OF 20141WPMP. NO; 990 OF 2014)

¶53

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to ratify the list of students admitted by the 2nd Petitioner and to treat the same as valid for all purposes including appearing in the examinations, pending the disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may^deemfitand proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶54

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. S NIRANJAN REDDY

¶55

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION

¶56

Counsel for the Respondents: 1597/P V S S S RAMA RAO

¶57

Counsel for the Respondents: .

¶58

¶59

%

¶60

The Court made the following:

¶61

Today when the Writ Petition came up for hearing, Ms.K.Tanusha, learned advocate representing on behalf of Sri.S.Niranjan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the cause in the present Writ Petition^doesnot survive and has become infructuous.

¶62

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶63

f Consequently miscellaneous applications pending, if

¶64

any, in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed.

¶65

/ /

¶66

Sd/- B. CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SE OFFICER

One CC to M/s. S. Niranjan Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

¶71

Two CCs to GP for Higher Education, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶72

One CC to Sri. P.V.S.S.S. Rama Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

¶73

Three CD Copies.

HIGH COURT

V DATED: 12/02/2024

ORDER

WP.No.906 of 2014

DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

¶80

Sri Koundinya Educational Society, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Koundinya Educational Society, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bonam Venkata Chalamayya Educational Society Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh.

Jasti Srikanth Vs The Central Board of Secondary Education

Dr.Jyothirmayi Degree College, Behind A.P.H.B. Colony, Vs The State of a.P., rep.by its Principal Secretary, Higher

Jaya Educational society Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Siddireddi Venkateswara Rao, Vs Union of India

Gopikrishna Educational Scty,Ysr Dist Vs Govt.of Ap,Prl.Scy,P.Education,Hyd,and 4