Shaik Hussain Basha, v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI…
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 7821 OF 2017
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondents in making efforts to forcibly evict the Petitioners from H.Nos.8-115 and 8-218 of 8“^ Ward, Narayanapuram, Nadikudi Gram Panchayat, Dachepally Mandal, Guntur district respectively during the subsistence of the interim order dated 8.12.2016 in W.P.No.40387/2016, wherein a positive direction was given to
f
,,y
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 9648 OF 20171
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps to dispossess us from H.Nos.8-115 and 8-218 of 8th Ward, Narayanapuram, Nadikudi Gram Panchayat, Dachepally Mandal, Guntur district respectively without following due process of law, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
I.A. NO: 4 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 43017 OF 2017)
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
/■
...RESPONDENTS
...PROPOSED RESPONDENT No.5
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Permit the them to plead the Tahsildar, Dacherpatly Mandal, Guntur District as Respondent in the above Writ Petition, as he is proper and necessary party to this Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI MEDURI VARA PRASADA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
I i
/ »'
4
APHC010090332017
050 0i
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAYL.. OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE honourable DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 7fi21 OF 2017
Between:
Shaik Hussain Basha, and Others
AND
State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petltloner(S): 1.MEDURI VARA PRASADA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
...PETITIONER(S)
...RESPONDENT(S)
( ( I
1GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:-
No representation for the petitioners.
When the matter i IS taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader, Home for the respondents, on instructions categorically submitted that the respondent/ police authorities have never interfered with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners houses bearing H.Nos. 8-115 and 8-218, 8*^ Ward, Narayanapuram, Nadikudi Gram Panchayat, Dachepally Mandal, Guntur District nor tried to dispossess them from the said property at
\
\
I
any point of time. Therefore, requested to record the sameandclosethewrit petition.
Recording the submissions of learned Assistant Government Pleader, Home for the respondents/ police, this Writ Petitionis closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shallalsostanddosed.
To,
Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION^^ICER
I
Cnr
\
\
HIGH COURT
PAXED:23/04/2024
4 «
% * •
ORDER
WP.No.7821 of 2017
CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS
Shaik Hussain Basha
Shaik Phakir Ahmed
State of Andhra Pradesh
Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh
Superintendent of Police, Guntur District
Station House Officer, Dachepally Police Station
K. MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court