Writ petition seeking protection against dispossession of land at Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam was dismissed as infructuous on the petitioner's counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 27362 OF 2015
Between:
...Petitioner
AND
4
Police, East Zone, Visakhapatnam.
Koiiada Vara Prasad, S/o.late Gangaji, Hindu, Aged about 30 years, Ocu: Business, R/o.D.No.53-39-8, K.R.M.Colony, Visakhapatnam.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutioi n of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the respondent Nos.3 to 8 in trying to dispossess the petitioner from the land in an extent of 800 sq. yards in Survey No.6 of Maddilapalem, Visakhapatna m, Visakhapatnam District, in collusion with the unofficial respondents 9 & 10 and further threatening the petitioner with dire consequences of implicating in criminal cases, by misusing their official capacity as illegal, arbitrary. unjust, and discriminatory, against the principles of natural justice and also in violation of Article 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner by interfering with his peaceful possession and enjoyment over the land in an extent of 800 sq. yards in Survey No.6 of Maddilapale m. Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam
%
District, and to pass such other order or orders as it deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 35533 OF
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere and dispossess the petitioner from the land in an extent of 800 sq. yards in Survey No.6 of Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, in the interest of the justice and to pass such other order or orders as it deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G.L. Nageswar Rao
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to3, 5 & 7: GP for Home
Counsel for the Respondent No.9: G. Rama Gopal
Counsel for the Respondent No.10: S. Sri Rama Chandra Murthy
Counsel for the Respondent No.4, 6 & 8:
The Court made the following:
v
S
APHC010002912015
*■
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 27362/2015
\ \
Between:
Palla Parvathi
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.G L NAG ESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP)
2.343/G RAMA GOPAL
The Court made the following Order:
Ms.M.Sarada, learned counsel representing Mr.G.L.Nageswar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that thecauseinthepresentwrit petition does not survive, and it has become infructuous.
official respondents is present.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
Infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand
closed.
SD/- P. VINOD KUMAR //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
SECTION OFFICER
PAS
HIGH COURT
DATED:23/04/2024
ORDER
WP.No.27362 of 2015
S 2 5 OCT 2!)24 S
Currenl Seciion ^
DISWIISSING THEWP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Palla Parvathi
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department
The Commissioner of Police, Visakhapatnam City
The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Task Force, Visakhapatnam
Mr. Chitti Babu
Koiiada Vara Prasad
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
