Writ petition seeking mandamus to register an FIR against a private respondent for assault and land grabbing was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the cause did not survive for adjudication. No costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5143 OF 2017
Between:
Kayam Narayana Reddy, S/o. Ranga Reddy, Occ: Private Employee Aged about 38 Yrs, R/o Kayam (V), Bramhanapattu (P), Vadamalapea (M), Chittor Dist, A.P.
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No. 3 in not registering any FIR against the fourth respondent who beated, threatened that he will kill the petitioner soon and attempted to grab the land forcefully as arbitrary, illegal, against rule of law, natural justice.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 6253 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 2 & 3 to register an FIR against the Respondent No. 4, arrest the Respondent No. 4 in the interest of justice
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D V RAO
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 3: GP FOR HOME (AP)
Counsel for the Respondents No.4 to 7: GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: Order
\
& APHC010045322017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5143 OF 2017
Between:
Kayam Narayana Reddy ...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP)
2.15548/GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Ms. Brahmani Devarakonda, learned counsel, representing Mr. D.V.Rao, learned counsel for petitioner submitted thatthecause in this Writ Petition does not survive any further for adjudicationandbecameinfructuous.
In view of the said submission made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.Noorderastocosts.
The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shallalsostandclosed.
Sd/- P.U.V.BHASKARA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// /' SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
»
DATE0:22/04/2024
ANDfy;^^^
AOS 0 7 JAN 2025 Co
Current Section
^SPATCVAfegsP^
ORDER
WP.No.5143 of 2017
DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
kriXL.::. f-
Kayam Narayana Reddy
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Superintendent of Police, Tirupathi
SHO, Gajulamanyam P.S.
K Murali Reddy
Joint Collector, Chittoor District
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
