The court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner informed the court that the cause of action did not survive, rendering the matter no longer viable for adjudication.
No order as to costs; writ petition dismissed; miscellaneous petitions stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
:■} a'
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 722 OF 2018
Between:
CBR College of Elementary teacher Education Institution, Sponsored by CBR Academy of Sports and Education , Rep. by Joint SecretarySriVenkata Satynarayana, S/o.Rama Murthy. Aged 48 years, R/o. Npvepothavaram village, Ibrahimpatnam,Krishna District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
\ 'Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thO circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the proceedings of the 2nd respondent issued Rc.No.92/A/SCERT/2017 dated 24-11-2017 trying to disperse the petitioner college students to other colleges where the vacancies are available instead of approval of the students list and conduct 1st year D.EI.Ed examination for the academic year 2016-17 is illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and violation of the Rules and Consequentlytosetaside proceedings of the 2nd respondent Rc.No.92/A/SCERT/2017dated24-11- 2017.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Re.No.92/A/SCERT/2017dated 24-11-2017,to approvalofthestudents list, issue Hall Tickets and conduct the 1st year D.EI.Edexaminationfor the academic year 2016-17 to the petitioner college pending disposal of the above writ Petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2018
Between:
■'ii
...Petitioners/Respondents
AND
CBR College of Elementary teacher Education Institution, Sponsored by CBR Academy of Sports and Education , Rep. by Joint Secretary Sri Venkata Satynarayana, S/o. Rama Murthy. Aged 48 years, R/o. Novepothavaram village, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District.
...Respondent/Petitioner
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted in WP No.722of2018dated 05.01.2018.
Counsel for the Petltioner(s): SMT. Y ANUPAMA DEVI
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 5 : GP FOR SCHOOLEDUCATION
The Court made the following; ORDER
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.722 of 2018
ORDER:
Smt.Y.Anupama Devi, learned counsel for the petitioner, informed this Court that the cause in theWrit Petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. Hence, prayed to dismiss the Writ Petition.
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,inthis Writ Petition shall stand closed.
SD/- V.SAVITHRI GOWRI ASSISTANT REGISTR.AR //TRUE COPY// 4^CTI0N: OFFICER
To,
Madhu
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/02/2024
ORDER
WP.No.722 of 2018
S 0 6 JUL 2124
S^SPATC»^
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
CBR College of Elementary teacher Education Institution
State of Andhra Pradesh
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
