Writ petition seeking admission to the LLB course for academic year 2017-18 under an APLAWCET provisional allotment order was dismissed as infructuous, no counsel appearing for the petitioner and the cause not surviving.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
••
-o-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATUfs (m 35
’'O
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
>viih
MONDAY. THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY,
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA /
WRIT PETITION NO: 967 OF 201
Between:
/■ Shaik MD. Julfeekhar, S/o SulaimanBasha, Near RMS colony, Tadepalli Post, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District
...PETITIONER
AND
v/ ...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the
s
nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action ofthe4thRespondentin denying the provisional allotment order by issuing a certificate dated 30.10.201^as illegal arbitrary and contrary to theRulesandconsequently direct the 4th respondent to give admissions to thepetitionerasperthe provisional allotment order dated 26-10-2017.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to direct the 4th Respondent to admit the petitionerinthe1styear LLB course for the academic year 2017-18 by settingasidethecertificate issued by the 4th Respondent dated 30.10.2017, pendingdisposalofthe above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): -
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVEAFFAIRS Counsel for the Respondent No,2 : M/S S PARINEETA,SCforAPSCHE Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI T.S.N. SUDHAKAR,SCFORSKU Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI B VENKATESWARARAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.967 of 2018
ORDER:
No representation on behalf of the learned counselforthe petitioner.
- As the matter pertains to the APLAWCET/APPGLCET-2017 this Court is of the opinion that the cause in the writ petition does not survive.
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if anyinthe Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/- M.PRABHAKARA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
^.-^T^ne CC to M/S S PARINEETA, SC FOR APSCHE [OPUC
c
A i
MIGH COURT
DATED:05/02/2024
ORDER
WP.No.967 of 2018
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Shaik MD. Julfeekhar
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Law
A.P. State Council of Higher Education (APSCHE), Rep by its Convenor
Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Rep by its Registrar
Jagarlamudi Chandramouli College of Law, Rep. by its Principal
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
