The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 44887 of 2017 seeking ratification of out-of-state admissions, holding the petition to be infructuous.
The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 44887 OF 2017
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3 respondent in rejecting the request of the petitioners to ratify the admission of out of students admitted to the 2"^^ Petitioner institution in Polytechnic Course for the academic year 2017-2018 as being illegal
arbitrary unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith ratify and approve the admissions out ofstatestudents listed in Annexure P-1 whose admission was rejected by the 3^^ respondents and admitted in the 2'^'^ petitioner institution underthe left over vacant seats ^ .. (spot admissions) category and treat the saidadmissionsasvalidfor all purposes. lA NO: 1 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner institution to impart training in Polytechnic Course in their respective branches including issuance of hall tickets, appearance in the examinations and declaration of results to the said out of state students listed in Annexure P- 1 whose admission was rejected by the respondent, pending the disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI K. SANTHANAM RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI P.V.S.S.S. RAMARAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI V. KISHORE
The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.44887 of 2017
ORDER:
Mr.K.Shanthan Rao, learned counsel representing Mr.P.Pandu Ranga Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the submits that the writ petition has become petitioners infructuous.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs,
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/- K. KASI RAO ACHARI ASSISTANT/REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Cnr
HIGH COURT
DATED:05/02/2024
ORDER
WP.No.44887 of 2017
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Vijaya Behara Welfare Society
Behara Subhakar Polytechnic
B.Vijaya Chaitanya
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The State Board of Technical Education and Training
The Convenor, AP-POLYCET-2017(Admission)
Justice V.Suujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
