Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the cause no longer survives; no order as to costs and pending interlocutory applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Writ Petition No.6936 of 2014
ORDER :
Mr.Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel, represented on behalf of Mr.P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending,
shall stands closed.
_____________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
Date : 25.01.2024
ARR
2
HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Writ Petition No.6936 of 2014
Date: 25.01.2024
ARR
K. Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
