Writ petition concerning a church dispute and Crime No.131/12 in Dummulapeta, Kakinada. Counsel submitted the cause did not survive and no further orders were required; the court recorded this and closed the writ petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 39172 OF 2014
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especiallyoneinthenature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in addressing the letter to the 3rd respondent as if thematteriscompromised in Crime No.131/12 and permitting the 5th respondentandotherswhoare arrayed as B-Party in Crime No. 131/12 to open thechurchsituatedatDoor No. 16-1-7, 1st Street, Dummulapeta, Kakinada, EastGodavariDistrict,as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the 4th respondent to close the Church forthwith, till thedisputesareresolvedby the third respondent pending before the 3rd respondent.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 49128 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourt maybe pleased direct to direct the 4th respondent to closetheChurch,situatedat Door No. 16-1-7, 1st Street, Dummulapeta, Kakinada, East Godavari District till the Section 107 proceedings are finalisedbythe3rdrespondent in Crime No.131/2012, dated 01.12.2012, pending disposaloftheabove Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. TVS PRABHAKARARAO
Counsel for the Respondents 1, 2 & 4 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : -
The Court made the following: ORDER
1
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.39172 of 2014
ORDER:
Both the learned counsel are present.
- Sri Siva Nagarjuna, learned counsel representing Sri T.V.S.Prabhakar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive. as such, no further orders are required.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ petition is closed. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
SD/-SK MD RAFI //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR cA^ /-SECTION OFFICER
To,
- One CC to SRI T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Advocate [OPUC]
- Two CCs to GP for HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
- Two CCs to GP for REVENUE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
- Three CD Copies
Madhu
HIGH COURT
DATED:24/01/2024
ORDER
3?an6>7^
5 11 JUL 202‘i
WP.No.39172 of 2014
CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Thiridhi Satyam
Perla Haleloya
Surada Nookaraju
Mosa Prasad
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary (Home Department)
Superintendent of Police, East Godavari District
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
