Common order dismissing two writ petitions along with associated interim applications for non-prosecution. The court observed the absence of representation by the petitioners.
Writ petitions and interim applications dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RACT
WRIT PETITION NO: 29256 AND 30054 OF 2014
WRIT PETITION NO: 29256 OF 2014 /
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
7
[ytd; Ahmed Ali Sha, S/o. Late Ahmed Mohiuddin @ Peersab,aged ^dtout 55 years, Occ: Legal practioner, R/o. 1stfloor,Madhukanthi Apartments, Prakasham street, Ramaraopeta, Kakinada,EastGodavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.3 to 5 in harassing the petitioners highhandedly by interfering in their right, liberty and life guaranteed under the ConstitutionofIndia asillegal,arbitrary and in violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 nottoharassand not to interfere in our right, liberty and life guaranteedundertheconstitution of India.
LA. NO: 2 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 36580 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 not to harassandinterfereinthe right, liberty and life of the petitioners guaranteedundertheConstitutionof India, pending disposal of the writ petition.
’ I.A.^JO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 36579 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondent Nos. 3 to 5 to hand over the blank signed papers highhandedly collected from the petitioners including the original documents collected from the house of the petitioner No.1 and blank signed non judicial stamp papers, blank signed pronotes and blank signed papers collected from petitioners by the respondent No.5 to the petitioners pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. C RAMACHANDRA REDDY (NOT
PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 4 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRI VENKAT CHALLA
WRIT PETITION NO: 30054 OF 2014
Between:
Dr. Md. Ayesha Banu, D/o M.A.AIisha, aged 29 years,Occ;Doctor,R/oFlat NO. CCF1, Sai Rekha Rasidency, Prakasam Street, Ramaraopeta,Kakinada, E.G.District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order moreparticularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action oftherespondentpolice authorities in not taking action on the petitioner'scomplaintdt.27-06-2014 lodged against the 6th respondent and his supportersasillegal,arbitrary and against principles of natural justice being violativeofArticle14and21 of the Constitution of India and consequently directtherespondentpolice authorities to take action on the petitioner's complaint dt. 27-06-2014 against the 6th respondent and his supporters and furtherconsequently direct the respondent Nos. 3, 5 and 6 not to interfereinpetitioner'sright, liberty and life and further direct the respondent No.6 to handover petitioner's original certificates, cloths, books andbelongingstoPetitioner.
LA. NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 37562 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to direct, the respondent Nos. 3, 5 and 6 not to interfere in petitioner's right, liberty and life pending disposaloftheabovewritpetition.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 37561 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.6 to handover petitioner's original certificates cloths, books and belongings to the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. C RAMACHANDRA REDDY (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 5 : GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : SRI VENKAT CHALLA
The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION Nos.29256 & 30054 OF 2014
ORDER:
None appeansd for the petitioners. On an earlier occasion . ^ * i.e., on 09.01.2024 also, there is no representationonbehalfof the petitioners either personally or through any advocate. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecutingthe cases.
Sd/- B PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Madhu
HIGH COURT
DATED:25/01/2024
COMMON ORDER
WP.No.29256 and 30054 of 2014
i
1■‘.O
n i \ V,
V. ^4' v
'i>- \x'<br>VS
'V' ►s. r> 'V
•vii'.
DISMISSING BOTH WP’s FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Abdul Kareem Arif and others
Dr. Md. Ayesha Banu
State of Andhra Pradesh
Superintendent of Police, Kakinada
Circle Inspector of Police, Kakinada Urban
Station House Officer, III Town Police Station, Kakinada
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
